News

The Rule of Law

Eugene Weekly
Letter

Multiple letters opposing Measure 105 (End Oregon’s Sanctuary Policy) have recently appeared in EW and The Register-Guard. The writers appear to be working off talking points provided by one or more of Oregon’s illegal alien support groups. Let’s examine some of these:

Argument 1: Sanctuary makes Oregon safer. Eighteen of Oregon’s 36 county sheriffs beg to differ. Proponents of giving driver cards to illegal aliens (Measure 88) made the same bogus claim in 2014. Voters saw through that smokescreen and hopefully they’ll see through this one.

Argument 2: M105 would turn Oregon into a police state where the police will go hunting for illegal aliens. That’s nonsense. No police chief is going to devote resources to hunt down people whose only crime is being here illegally. But they will have to comply with ICE detainer requests.

Argument 3: The sponsors are a “hate group” according to the Southern Poverty Law Center. No thinking person should take the SPLC seriously anymore. In its early days the SPLC did some excellent work, e.g., going after the Klan and Aryan Nations. But it has morphed into little more than a smear factory targeting conservative individuals and groups. It recently paid a settlement of $3.4 million after smearing a Muslim man for — get this — condemning radical Islamic terrorism.

None of the writers mentions the key issues that Oregon’s sanctuary policy violates federal law and encourages illegal immigration to our state. Vote YES on Measure 105 to restore the rule of law in Oregon.

Fair Use: This site contains copyrighted material, the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of issues related to mass immigration. We believe this constitutes a "fair use" of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information, see: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode17/usc_sec_17_00000107----000-.html. In order to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond "fair use", you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.